If you expect the system to admit to fraud, corruption and injustice, it simply will not. The system is built to maintain control for the powerful. That is it. Fraud, corruption, and injustice are the operating system.
If you, as a strategy, frame your lawsuit on technical reasons that the system will allow, then you may achieve your goals.
If you frame your issue as a singular mistake, deviation or limited error the system may allow it through. Appeal Courts are created on the premise of unintentional errors. They preserve the system's apparent integrity. I am not suggesting an appeal, I am suggesting a new winning legal strategy may work in your favour, to reframe the issue.
Pick a winning strategy and you may succeed.
Choose the forbidden path and you will not succeed, how do I know, because I have tried that, many times....alway failed...
Even if your egal strategy is iron-clad, the law, the fact and jurisprudence are on your side, yoyr tactics are superb and for a while you may be defeating their moves.... but judicial corruption has not been played yet. We will see.
Any situation is winnable, if you find the winning angle. Unless you do the forbidden.
The legal system sucks, but once you see it for what it is, you may be able to succeed at your goals.
The famous quote often attributed to Mark Twain is: "It ain’t what you don’t know that gets you into trouble. It’s what you know for sure that just ain’t so". It means that overconfidence in false beliefs or incorrect "facts" causes more problems than ignorance.
The sentiment emphasizes the danger of clinging to outdated or wrong information as absolute truth.
What does winning look like, if it takes years of your life, untold fortunes to have a guy write down the truth on a piece of paper, a truth you already know, is it worth it? What they will never admit is the truth of the system, because the lie is where their power is... deception is the point. A con man never gives up the con, because there is no upside only consequences. He will die with the lie.
Hope this clarifies.