PRO SE PMA Forum - By using our website and services, you confirm your understanding of and agreement to our Terms of Service.

ESSAY: The Contract of Control: How Censorship and Registration Bind the Modern Mind

Introduction: The Paper Chains of the Modern Age

There was a time when a man’s word was his bond, when the handshake between two honest souls held more weight than the pages of any statute book. But those days have long since faded into the mist of modernity. Today, the world runs on contracts - invisible and visible, written and unwritten - designed not to bind two willing participants in fairness, but to bind the masses in servitude. Every application signed, every consent box ticked, and every registration completed forms another thread in a vast web of control. These are not the paper chains of commerce but of compliance.

And yet, the most remarkable deception is not that people are enslaved by paperwork, but that they volunteer for it - believing it necessary for participation in “civilized” society. We have mistaken control for order, censorship for protection, and registration for belonging. The result is a world where truth itself must now apply for permission to speak.

The Language of Ownership: From Trust to Transfer

When a man registers something, he transfers it. In the ancient understanding of trust law, to “register” was to hand over title, to move property out of private hands into a public realm of oversight. That which is registered ceases to be purely one’s own; it becomes part of a system governed by others. And yet, few realize this as they queue in line to register everything from their vehicles to their children’s births, believing they are simply obeying the law.

I’ve long argued that registration is the cornerstone of modern enslavement. It is not an act of protection but of surrender. The state does not ask for registration out of benevolence; it demands it to ensure traceability, accountability, and — above all — ownership. For ownership, in the modern sense, is no longer defined by stewardship, but by control.

Take, for example, the act of registering land. Many believe they thereby secure their property rights. Yet once registered, the title is transferred to the Crown ( Canada), and the owner becomes but a tenant under license. This is the grand illusion of ownership under statutory law - the idea that possession equals freedom, when in truth it equals permission.

This perverse transformation of ownership has spread to nearly every realm of human existence: from our data to our speech, from our creative works to our very identities. We have been trained to sign away dominion in exchange for a false sense of safety. It is, in effect, a Faustian bargain in bureaucratic dress

The Censorship Contract: The Unseen Terms of “Free” Speech

Censorship today no longer requires the bonfire or the bludgeon. It comes softly, wrapped in legal language and terms of service. Every time one clicks “I agree,” one enters into a contract of silence - a compact not of conscience but of compliance. These contracts are written not to protect truth but to protect systems of control.

I have seen it again and again: men who speak inconvenient truths find themselves deplatformed, demonetized, or erased. Yet when they protest, they are told they “violated the terms.” Such a phrase is a masterpiece of psychological inversion. For the modern tyrant needs no chains when consent will suffice.

The mechanism is diabolical in its simplicity. Corporations present “free” platforms while quietly asserting ownership over all speech that occurs within them. Once accepted, users surrender both their words and their right to contest their removal. It is not open censorship by the sword; it is hidden censorship by signature.

The Founders of nations once fought for the right to speak truth without fear of reprisal. Now, men are taught to read the “community guidelines” before they open their mouths. And thus, liberty — once the roaring flame of civilization — is reduced to a flickering candle under a bureaucrat’s breath.

Registration of the Mind: Education as Indoctrination

No chain is stronger than the belief that it does not exist. That, I believe, is the greatest accomplishment of the modern education system. It has not only registered the body of the child but has enrolled the mind in a curriculum of submission.

From the moment a child is issued a birth certificate - that first act of registration - he is catalogued, numbered, and entered into a system designed to mold thought, not cultivate reason. The schools, far from being temples of learning, have become factories of consent. They teach not how to think, but what to think.

Students are trained to accept censorship as courtesy, compliance as civility, and authority as truth. Independent inquiry - once the mark of a free mind - is now branded as rebellion or conspiracy. And so the child grows into an adult who defends his own servitude, convinced that those who question are dangerous to “democracy.”

The modern mind, registered through schooling and social contracts, no longer seeks truth but validation. It does not challenge; it conforms. This, I fear, is how control is most effectively perpetuated: not by force of law, but by formation of thought.

IV. The Digital Serfdom: Data as the New Domain

The digital age has completed what centuries of empire could not - the total registration of humanity. Every click, purchase, search, and movement now contributes to a vast registry of behavioural ownership. Our very selves have become commodities, leased to advertisers and analyzed by algorithms.

Consider the smartphone. It is presented as a tool of liberation, yet functions as a leash of surveillance. Every application demands consent to access location, contacts, and communication — a polite way of saying, “hand over your private life.”

Once again, the mechanism of control operates under the illusion of choice.

And it is not just data that is being harvested, but patterns - the predictive map of human thought itself. What we buy, whom we love, what we read - all catalogued, classified, and resold. It is registration in its purest digital form. And with artificial intelligence now serving as the clerk of this registry, there will soon be no aspect of life unrecorded or unregulated.

The irony is bitter: we have built our own prisons out of convenience. Like the medieval serf who toiled on land he did not own, the modern man now labours on digital soil owned by corporations, his efforts harvested in the currency of information. We have become data peasants in the empire of silicon.

V. Consent as the Currency of Control

There is a crucial difference between coercion and consent. Coercion breeds resistance; consent breeds obedience. The modern system thrives on the latter. Every form, every click, every policy we “accept” is a subtle act of self-subjugation. We consent to surveillance, taxation, censorship, and registration not because we are forced, but because we are conditioned.

This conditioning is so effective that most now equate consent with morality. “You agreed,” they say, as though that absolves the deceiver of his deceit. Yet consent given without full understanding is not agreement; it is manipulation. And manipulation dressed in legal language is the dark art of governance in our time.

What we face is not tyranny by decree, but tyranny by design - a contractual labyrinth so vast that most wander it unknowingly. From software licenses to banking terms, from medical forms to social media agreements, the net is complete. And the only escape lies in recognition - the moment one realizes that the power of consent also contains the power of refusal.

For just as one can sign away authority, one can revoke it. The individual remains the highest authority under divine law, so long as he remembers that his signature — literal or digital — is sacred. To consent blindly is to abdicate sovereignty; to discern before consenting is to reclaim it.

Conclusion: The Courage to Unregister

The system of control does not thrive on force but on fear - the fear of being unregistered, unseen, or unaccepted. But I have found that true freedom begins precisely at that moment: when one chooses to step outside the registry, to refuse the contract of control.

This is not a call to anarchy but to conscience. It is the rediscovery of individual sovereignty under God’s law - the recognition that no man, no institution, no algorithm has the moral right to own another’s will. To unregister from deception is to register once more with truth.

The challenge before us is monumental, yet simple in its essence: to say “no” when the world expects our silent “yes.” To think freely when all others parrot slogans. To speak truthfully even when the contract forbids it. For every signature of submission can be undone by a single act of courage - the refusal to comply with lies.

Censorship, registration, and consent - these are the trinity of modern control. But they are also the mirrors through which we may rediscover the self. For just as the chains of servitude are made of paper, so too can they be torn by conviction. The soul of man remains unregistrable, and therein lies our hope.

Source:
https://open.substack.com/pub/soberchri ... ontrol-how