PRO SE PMA Forum - By using our website and services, you confirm your understanding of and agreement to our Terms of Service.

Let Us Define Evil

Introduction

In navigating the complexities of our world, particularly in light of the profound events of recent years, understanding the concept of evil becomes paramount. This essay delves into the multifaceted definitions of evil, drawing upon established references, and seeks to apply these definitions to contemporary circumstances, specifically the COVID-19 situation and the broader understanding of viruses. It is crucial to equip ourselves with the knowledge and discernment necessary to identify and confront evil, thereby safeguarding ourselves and contributing to a more righteous world. This exploration is not merely an academic exercise; it is a call to vigilance and a reaffirmation of the importance of truth in the face of deception.

Defining Evil: A Foundation

To embark on a meaningful discussion about evil, it is essential to establish a solid foundation of understanding. The International Standard Bible Encyclopedia provides a comprehensive starting point. According to this authoritative source, evil encompasses both moral and physical dimensions. It acknowledges that suffering and adversity are inherent aspects of the human experience, but it also makes a critical distinction: not all suffering originates from intentional malevolence. Natural disasters, accidents, and illnesses can inflict immense pain and hardship without being the result of a deliberate act of evil. However, the encyclopedia emphasizes that moral evil, the kind that stems from conscious and deliberate acts, is unequivocally not from God. God, in His divine nature, is the epitome of goodness and righteousness; evil stands in stark opposition to His character. This distinction is crucial, as it clarifies that while suffering may exist in the world, its source is not attributable to the divine.

Expanding upon this foundation, it's beneficial to consider secular definitions of evil. Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary offers a range of perspectives that enrich our comprehension. Firstly, evil is characterized by qualities that inherently cause injury, mischief, and harm. This definition highlights the active and destructive nature of evil; it is not merely a passive absence of good but an active force that inflicts damage. Secondly, evil is associated with moral corruption, a deviation from ethical principles and righteous behavior. This aspect underscores the ethical dimension of evil, emphasizing its opposition to virtue and goodness. Furthermore, evil is defined as that which causes sorrow, distress, and misery, underscoring its impact on human well-being. Anything that significantly impairs happiness and diminishes the quality of life can be considered evil. The dictionary also points to moral badness as a core element of evil, reinforcing its connection to unethical conduct. Finally, it's noteworthy that even malady or disease can be classified as evil, acknowledging the physical suffering and impairment of health that can afflict individuals.

These definitions, both religious and secular, converge on a central understanding: evil is a force that opposes good, inflicts harm, and diminishes well-being, whether physically, emotionally, or morally. With these definitions as our guide, we can now turn our attention to the critical task of discerning evil in the world around us.

The Urgency of Understanding Evil in Our Time

The importance of understanding the concept of evil cannot be overstated, particularly when reflecting on the events of recent years. The COVID-19 pandemic and the subsequent global response have brought to the forefront questions about power, control, and the potential for malevolence on a grand scale. It is my firm belief that the COVID agenda, as it unfolded, exhibited characteristics that align with the very definitions of evil we have explored. This assertion requires careful examination and a willingness to confront uncomfortable truths.

The Alleged Evil of the COVID Situation

The claim that the COVID situation was marked by evil is a serious one, and it necessitates a detailed explanation. Several key aspects of the situation, as I perceive them, lend credence to this perspective. Firstly, there is evidence suggesting that certain actions were undertaken with the intention to cause harm. This includes allegations of deliberate manipulation of data, suppression of dissenting voices, and the promotion of policies that prioritized control over individual well-being. Secondly, the pursuit of population reduction is a deeply disturbing accusation that has been leveled against some of the architects of the COVID response. If substantiated, such an objective would unequivocally fall within the realm of evil, representing a profound disregard for human life.

Furthermore, the claim that the COVID agenda aimed to cause sickness and generate reliance on pharmaceutical interventions is deeply troubling. The potential for profiting from human suffering and death represents a grave moral transgression. To exploit vulnerability and illness for financial gain is a hallmark of evil, a betrayal of the fundamental principles of compassion and care.

The Complex Issue of Viruses

The concept of viruses plays a central role in the COVID narrative, and it is an area that warrants careful scrutiny. It is undeniable that many people, including those with good intentions, believe in the existence and behavior of viruses as they have been presented by mainstream science. However, it is also crucial to acknowledge that much of this belief is based on indirect evidence and trust in authority. Few individuals have personally witnessed the isolation and manipulation of a virus in a laboratory setting. This reliance on authority, while often necessary in a complex world, can also leave us vulnerable to deception.

It is important to consider the possibility that some individuals and institutions in positions of authority may be genuinely misled. Scientific paradigms can be resistant to change, and even well-meaning scientists may adhere to established theories without critically examining underlying assumptions. However, it is equally important to acknowledge the potential for deliberate manipulation. Some individuals may knowingly perpetuate the idea of viruses for personal gain, power, and control. This possibility must be investigated with rigor and an open mind.

The Alleged Fraudulent Nature of Virology

The field of virology, the study of viruses, has come under scrutiny in recent years, with some researchers raising serious concerns about its methodological soundness. One key point of contention revolves around the concept of "isolation." The term is often used in virology to describe the process of separating a virus from its host cells. However, critics argue that the methods employed do not truly isolate the virus in a pure form. Instead, they often involve culturing cells and observing their behavior after exposure to a sample. This indirect approach, it is argued, can lead to misinterpretations and flawed conclusions.

The work of researchers like Dr. Stefan Lanka has further fueled this debate. Dr. Lanka's experiments have challenged the conventional understanding of virus isolation, suggesting that the standard practices in virology are fundamentally flawed. His findings raise the possibility that the entire field may be built upon a foundation of fraud. This is a bold claim, but it demands serious consideration and further investigation.

Freedom of Information and the Question of Proof

In recent years, freedom of information requests have been filed in various countries, including Canada and the United States, seeking concrete evidence of virus isolation. These requests have yielded surprising results. In many cases, institutions have been unable to provide evidence of having isolated any virus. This lack of empirical proof raises profound questions about the validity of the entire virological paradigm. If the very existence of viruses cannot be definitively demonstrated, then the implications are far-reaching.

The Implications of the Absence of Virus Isolation

The absence of conclusive evidence for virus isolation has significant implications. If the concept of viruses is indeed a fraud, as some researchers contend, then everything derived from this fraud must be re-evaluated. This includes vaccinations, antiviral medications, and public health policies that are based on the assumption that viruses are the primary cause of infectious diseases. The potential consequences of this realization are enormous, and they underscore the urgency of pursuing truth and accountability.

A Call to Action: Discerning Truth and Rejecting Fear

In the face of these complex and challenging issues, a call to action is essential. It is imperative that individuals arm themselves with knowledge, cultivate critical thinking skills, and reject the pervasive influence of fear. Fear can cloud judgment, distort perception, and make us susceptible to manipulation. By embracing truth and exercising discernment, we can empower ourselves to make informed decisions and protect ourselves from harm.

This is not a call to reckless defiance or disregard for public health. Rather, it is a plea for responsible skepticism and a commitment to seeking evidence-based understanding. It is a recognition that the pursuit of truth is a collective endeavor, requiring open dialogue, rigorous inquiry, and a willingness to challenge conventional wisdom.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the task of defining and discerning evil is a complex but essential one. By drawing upon established definitions and critically examining contemporary events, we can gain a clearer understanding of the forces that threaten our well-being. The COVID-19 situation and the ongoing debate about the nature of viruses serve as a stark reminder of the importance of vigilance and discernment. It is my hope that this exploration has contributed to a deeper understanding of these critical issues, empowering individuals to stand firm in the face of evil and to strive for a more righteous and just world. The pursuit of truth is an ongoing journey, and it requires courage, integrity, and a unwavering commitment to the common good.



Podcast:

https://soberchristiangentlemanpodcast. ... ebroadcast