BC lawyer who inadvertently double-dipped for decades reprimanded

Website Notice: By accessing and using this website, you are assumed to be acting in your private capacity as a member of our Private Membership Association (PMA), operating under natural law and private contracts. This website is exclusively for private individuals engaging in lawful private activities. If you intend to operate in a public capacity, please exit this website immediately. For further details, refer to our Terms and Service Agreement. To declare in writing that you are not acting as a private member of the PMA, please contact management directly. To read our tems of service read them here:
https://prosepma.ca/forum/viewtopic.php?p=89#p89

We encourage new members to introduce yourself here so that we may get to know you.

Remember to Sign up with a "nom de guerre" (French for "war name"), which is a pseudonym used in a specific context, your specific reasons are your own. It's a way for individuals to conceal their true identity, usually during wartime or in situations where anonymity is necessary. This practice has historical roots, dating back to French army recruits being assigned names related to their hometowns or physical characteristics in the 15th century.

Security and Anonymity:
In times of conflict, in political tensions, as well as jeopardy from government overreach through legislation, regulation and political activism, a nom de guerre allows individuals to operate under a false name, protecting their identity and potentially their lives.

Everyday Life:
Noms de guerre could be used in everyday life as a substitute for one's real family name, offering a layer of anonymity, so one can speak freely and with sincerity with out blowback in their everyday lives.

We all have a right to privacy, in our private lives and in our associations, such as this PMA. The bad faith political activists want to remove our ability to speak frankly and privately so they can terrorize us into compliance out of fear of repercussions. Reclaiming our privacy is a step in the correct direction.

We operate on the Natural Law Principle of 'HARM NO ONE', so vexatious conduct, 'Trolling' or generally abusive conduct will not be tolerated. You will be give 2 warnings then deleted for cause if you persist. We believe in freedom of Speech as long as we share this common platform in a cordial manners conducive to cooperation and collaboration.

For the month of November anf December Membership will be free.

To Become after that, a Contributing Member requires a yearly $20 donation, equivalent to a 1 once Silver Coin, starting in December, then it will be $25 if signing up in January 2026, then $30 in February.... The sooner the better. This entitles you to contribute content, ask questions and collaborate with our other Members across the North or in your specific jurisdiction.

The Forum at this time will be Free for anyone to look, read and learn.

When you sign up please check your SPAM folder for the confirmation email.
Post Reply
User avatar
White Wolf
Posts: 242
Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2025 1:58 pm

BC lawyer who inadvertently double-dipped for decades reprimanded

Post by White Wolf »

Image

May 25, 2025 - 12:00 PM
A distinguished BC Crown prosecutor who likely billed for millions of dollars of wages he found out later that he shouldn't have billed for has been found to have committed professional misconduct.

According to a May 9 BC Law Society decision, former BC Crown prosecutor James W Lees was in a rather unique position, working a full time job as a provincial Crown prosecutor, but also for the federal Crown on the side. For at least the last 14 years, he billed the federal government for his time in court, even when he was there for his regular job.

"He received double payment for his time every day in court," the Law Society decision reads. "Each day, the lawyer billed all of his time until the last federal file was called in court, even though he would be addressing provincial files within that time."

The decision says senior management was aware of how he billed for his time, but the issue wasn't flagged for almost 20 years.

The BC Law Society doesn't give a dollar figure for how much Lees was overpaid, but over the years it likely ran into the millions.

Lees became a lawyer in 1984 and two years later began working for the BC Prosecution Service, and remained there for 35 years. In the late nineties, he also started working for private law firms that had contracts with the federal prosecution service. He's considered an expert in charge approval.

In BC, most crimes are prosecuted by the provincial Crown, but some, largely drug offences, are prosecuted by the federal Crown. In 1996, while working for the provincial Crown, Lees started doing contract work for the federal Crown.

Between 2005 and 2020 he billed on average 25 to 30 hours per week for his federal court appearances, of which, about 70% was "waiting time."

However, during most of those waiting hours, Lees was in court anyway doing his full-time job as a provincial Crown prosecutor at the Surrey courthouse.

He also billed for travel time, even though he had to go to court for his regular job.


No one was concerned, but over time, his workload began to grow. For the last 15 years, on average, he billed for 2,622 hours a year — roughly 50 hours per week.


While the decision doesn't say how much extra Lees was paid, based on the current lowest hourly rate for federal prosecutors of $112, it works out to $293,664 a year. Over 15 years that would be $4.4 million.

"These (hourly) figures arose because of the manner in which the lawyer had always billed, including travel time, available time, and waiting time, even when he was speaking to provincial cases in court," the BC Law Society decision reads.

The decision says Lees was told how to bill in the late nineties and continued to do it the same way after that.

"He obtained explicit approval from senior leadership at the BC Prosecution Service... as well as from the Public Prosecution Service of Canada and the firms, to handle BC Prosecution Service and Public Prosecution Service of Canada courtroom work on the same day," the Law Society said. "Over the years, BC Prosecution Service senior management at Surrey changed, but management was aware of his ongoing work as a federal agent and did not raise concerns with him."

He did seek some clarification in later years but was given the same billing direction.

"He relied on that direction," the decision says.

The decision says the BC Prosecution Service didn't know how Lees billed and didn't question him about it, and the federal prosecution service "apparently did not monitor or scrutinize the lawyer’s federal billings."

It was only after paying him the same way for more than 20 years, that the federal prosecution service then reported it to the BC Law Society in early 2021.

While Lees billed the same way for years, it was in 2006 that his hours ramped up and the Law Society only takes issue with his timesheets from 2006.

It's not known whether Lees was fired or resigned, but the decision says the BC Prosecution Service "terminated" his employment in October 2021.

In 2020, he made $227,915 working for the provincial Crown.

The Law Society said it was mitigating that Lees had a reputation as a hard-working, capable and respected prosecutor. He was designated Queen's Counsel in 2009 and was an expert in charge approval.

"He vigorously applied the charge assessment test, resulting in fewer charges being approved, saving the public substantial amounts," the Law Society said.


The lawyer said he submitted his timesheet to his firm, which in turn submitted them to the federal prosecution service. The accounts would have been reviewed and audited over the years and he was never alerted to any concern or issue until 2021.

"Had the Public Prosecution Service or the law firms told him that his billings were unreasonable, he would have changed his billing practices," the decision says.

However, the Law Society said it was a lawyer's duty to not charge or accept a fee unless it is fair and reasonable.

"Although the lawyer may have honestly believed that his billings were reasonable, he was mistaken because he failed to appreciate that the changes in circumstances rendered his billings unreasonable," the Law Society said.

Lees signed a consent agreement admitting to professional misconduct.

There is no mention in the decision as to whether Lees will have to pay back any of the extra money he collected over the years. The Law Society didn't fine him, and there is no indication he's being sued by the Federal Prosecution Service

Link:
https://infotel.ca/newsitem/bc-lawyer-w ... d/it109306
Post Reply

Return to “Welcome to our Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest